Skip to content

Conversation

@estringana
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Reviewer checklist

  • Test coverage seems ok.
  • Appropriate labels assigned.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.76%. Comparing base (83b4cf2) to head (0d9977d).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3381   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.76%   61.76%           
=======================================
  Files         142      142           
  Lines       12895    12895           
  Branches     1689     1689           
=======================================
  Hits         7965     7965           
  Misses       4171     4171           
  Partials      759      759           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 83b4cf2...0d9977d. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Benchmarks [ tracer ]

Benchmark execution time: 2025-10-30 13:08:53

Comparing candidate commit 0d9977d in PR branch estringana/collect-framework-endpoints with baseline commit 83b4cf2 in branch master.

Found 10 performance improvements and 12 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 172 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:ComposerTelemetryBench/benchTelemetryParsing

  • 🟩 execution_time [-1357.325ns; -442.675ns] or [-11.803%; -3.849%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization

  • 🟩 execution_time [-3.269µs; -2.471µs] or [-3.173%; -2.399%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-5.935µs; -5.305µs] or [-5.713%; -5.107%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverhead

  • 🟩 execution_time [-60.261µs; -56.131µs] or [-22.803%; -21.240%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverhead-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-60.875µs; -57.080µs] or [-23.312%; -21.859%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverheadWithDBM

  • 🟩 execution_time [-61.331µs; -57.280µs] or [-23.242%; -21.707%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverheadWithDBM-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-60.840µs; -56.256µs] or [-23.268%; -21.514%]

scenario:PHPRedisBench/benchRedisOverhead

  • 🟩 execution_time [-284.740µs; -248.202µs] or [-26.819%; -23.378%]

scenario:PHPRedisBench/benchRedisOverhead-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-299.319µs; -264.498µs] or [-27.587%; -24.378%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching2

  • 🟥 execution_time [+66.153ns; +131.847ns] or [+5.645%; +11.252%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching3

  • 🟥 execution_time [+50.703ns; +110.297ns] or [+4.261%; +9.269%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching4

  • 🟥 execution_time [+80.724ns; +157.676ns] or [+6.920%; +13.516%]

scenario:SpanBench/benchOpenTelemetryAPI

  • 🟥 mem_peak [+1.465MB; +1.479MB] or [+3.526%; +3.561%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyDdprof

  • 🟥 execution_time [+3.692ms; +3.807ms] or [+43.534%; +44.897%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyDdprof-opcache

  • 🟥 execution_time [+3.650ms; +3.782ms] or [+42.742%; +44.281%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyOverhead

  • 🟥 execution_time [+3.551ms; +3.656ms] or [+44.855%; +46.184%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyOverhead-opcache

  • 🟥 execution_time [+3.535ms; +3.644ms] or [+44.102%; +45.465%]

scenario:TraceSerializationBench/benchSerializeTrace

  • 🟩 execution_time [-37.707µs; -26.793µs] or [-8.485%; -6.029%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressDdprof

  • 🟥 execution_time [+1.990ms; +2.238ms] or [+6.777%; +7.622%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressDdprof-opcache

  • 🟥 execution_time [+2.067ms; +2.192ms] or [+7.051%; +7.477%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressOverhead

  • 🟥 execution_time [+2.067ms; +2.257ms] or [+7.581%; +8.278%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressOverhead-opcache

  • 🟥 execution_time [+2.012ms; +2.218ms] or [+7.330%; +8.082%]

@estringana estringana force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch from 96601ba to 791f8e7 Compare August 27, 2025 10:38
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
--TEST--
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ignore this file




typedef enum ddog_crasht_CrashInfoBuilder_NewResult_Tag {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file got autogenerated

Cargo.lock Outdated
"backtrace",
"blazesym",
"cc",
"cc_utils",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This got removed automatically. Not sure why

}
);

if (!\DDTrace\are_endpoints_collected()) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will be adapted. Just an idea of how it will be used

@estringana estringana force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch from f5413d6 to e1212be Compare October 6, 2025 08:39
@cataphract cataphract force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch from 1a9903d to e1212be Compare October 10, 2025 09:55
@estringana estringana force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch 3 times, most recently from e2c597b to b66e5b7 Compare October 21, 2025 15:25
@estringana estringana force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch from f02430a to 0d9977d Compare October 30, 2025 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants